Sushmajee
Mahaabhaarat |
General
Doubts | Home | Mahaabhaarat | General |
Doubts-1 |
Doubts-1 Division of Hastinaapur Was Dushalaa, Dhritraashtra and Satyavatee's daughter, married to her uncle? Satyavatee was the daughter of Uparichar Vasu. Vasu had five sons also, while he had these five sons, one son and one daughter were also born from an Apsaraa (Adrikaa) living in fish form (read this story MBH, G-0-Prolog/13). He got them from a fisherman. He gave the girl to the fisherman and kept the son with him who later became the king of Matsya Desh. One of the five sons of Vasu was Brihadrath - king of Magadh Desh. Thus Brihadrath was half brother of Satyavatee. And Jayadrath was the son of Brihadrath. Dhritraashtra married his daughter to his grandmother Satyavatee's half brother's son Jayadrath - Dushalaa's uncle Dushalaa was Satyavatee's son's Vichitraveerya's
son Dhritraashtra's daughter - thus she was Satyavatee's granddaughter; and Jayadrath was the
son of her brother Brihadrath - means Satyavatee 's nephew. Thus Satyavatee's granddaughter
was married to her nephew, means Dushalaa was married to her uncle?
I think there were other marriages also of this type - Subhadraa, Krishn's
sister and Vasudev's daughter, was married to Vasudev's sister Kuntee's son
Arjun - thus Arjun was also Subhadraa's brother - Subhadraa's Buaa's son. Was that Dice Game for Pleasure? Playing the Dice Game is Yudhishthir's Mistake Saag Vidur Ghar Khaayo Why Karn Did Not Fight in Mahaabhaarat War for 10 Days? Bheeshm also put this condition that he would not fight
with Paandav if Karn will fight with him, although Karn had already laid down his weapons
before Bheeshm in the court, till Bheeshm was alive. Why Bheeshm did not Allow Karn to Fight Under His Commandrship? But Mahaabhaarat doesn't say this. Krishn Took a Wheel or Chakra? And we have also heard that it happened only once. It
is logical too because in this way Bhagavaan had to break His vow, and Bheeshm kept his
words. But it could not have happened twice, since Bhagavaan could not have made a mistake
twice. But in Mahaabhaarat, on the 4th day of the war, it is said
that He ran towards Bheeshm in His divine form taking up His Chakra to kill him and Arjun
stopped him with the fear of breaking His vow. And the same incident happens again, in the
same fashion, on the 9th day of the war. May I know how the first version came to public? Or otherwise
how could Krishn make a mistake twice (of breaking His vow)?
Difference Between Krishn and Raam's Periods This whole period of 864,000 years seems somewhat
strange for only 15 kings - 57, 600 for one king? It is doubtful? Bheeshm's Pillow But Mahaabhaarat says that Bheeshm refused to accept
any pillow brought by others, and asked Arjun to give one to him. While in above
version he just asked for it from anybody (not specifically from Arjun), and Arjun
gave it to him himself and that also before getting any pillow from Duryodhan. Drinking Water for Bheeshm
In the same way Bheeshm asked for some water, and Duryodhan
sent some people to bring water for him. Someone brought Gangaa water, someone brought
cool clean water for him, but by that time they brought it, Arjun had already hit an
arrow in the ground. A fresh cool water fountain came out of the ground and fell directly
in Bheeshm's mouth. Duryodhan again had a defeat from Arjun here. But the Mahaabhaarat says that Bheeshm refused to accept
any water brought by others, and asked Arjun to give some water to him. While in above
version he didn't ask for it specifically from Arjun, he just said that he was thirsty,
and Arjun himself gave it to him and that also before getting any water from Duryodhan
so the water brought became useless. Karn's Joining of Paandav Who Killed Bheeshm? Arjun or Shikhandee? But later Bheeshm said "Nobody else can kill me
except Arjun, so he should place Shikhandee in front of him and shoot arrows at me."
Arjun did the same thing as he was told. That is why nobody else was sad about Bheeshm's
death as much as Arjun was, because he himself had to kill Bheeshm. Although Shikhandee
also shot some arrows at him. After Bheeshm had fallen, in the beginning of Drone Parv,
Janamejaya says - "After Bheeshm was slain by Shikhandee, what did Dhritraashtra
do?" This shows that Bheeshm was killed by Shikhandee.
What is the truth? Who killed Bheeshm, Arjun or Shikhandee? Abhimanyu's Killing But Mahaabhaarat gives some different description. It
says that Dushaasan's son killed him with his mace. Karn cut his bow from behind,
Kritvarmaa killed his horses and Kripaa killed his two Saarathee. In this process
Jayadrath is nowhere to be seen. Jayadrath's role was only that he did not allow any
help to reach him. He was not so much at fault as Dushaasan's son who killed defenseless
Abhimanyu. In fact Drone (who suggested the way to kill him and later
cut his sword), Karn (who cut his bow and later his shield), Kritvarmaa (who killed his
horses), Kripaa (who killed his two Saarathee) and Dushaasan's son who really killed him
were the main killers of Abhimanyu, then why Arjun thought Jayadrath as his killer and
Bheeshm also supported it? Then why only Jayadrath should be blamed for his killing?
In fact Drone is the main killer of Abhimanyu who told the way to kill him. In fact Yudhishthir accepts this (in
Drone Parv-188), that Drone
and his son were responsible for Abhimanyu's killing. The preceptor himself told Karn the
means of Abhimanyu's slaughter. It was preceptor himself who cut Abhimanyu's weapon (sword).
And while fallen into such distress, Kritvarmaa most cruelly slew the steeds and the two
Paarshni drivers (of the boy). Other great bowmen then dispatched the son of Subhadraa. For
a little offence, O Krishn, was the ruler of the Sindhu..... [see
6-war, 25-battle-15),
but still Arjun killed Jayadrath for this incident. Why?
Why Did They Kill Abhimanyu? Duryodhan handed over the management of the Vyooh to
Jayadrath. He was standing on the first gate to make sure that everything goes all
right as planned. The Vyooh had automated closing up as soon as someone had entered.
So as soon as Abhimanyu entered the Vyooh, the first gate closed and his uncles could
not enter, because they did not know even how to enter it. If this was the case, then I don't
understand, that why Jayadrath did not allow at least Yudhishthir to enter? Because by
creating this Vyooh, their purpose was to capture Yudhishthir, not to kill Abhimanyu.
They did not even expect that a child of 16 years of age will come to fight with them
by breaking that Vyooh. Because they also knew that only two people could break that
Vyooh - Krishn and Arjun, and that is why they sent them after Susharmaa. But by allowing Yudhishthir to enter
the Vyooh, they could have easily captured him and as soon as they had captured Yudhishthir,
the war was over. Their aim was not to kill Abhimanyu, their aim was to capture Yudhishthir
to end the war.
Appearance of Ghatotkach Surprisingly enough, he did not fight such
fierce war during the other days of the war. |
Home | Mahaabhaarat | General |
|
Created by Sushma Gupta on 05/27/04
Contact: sushmajee@yahoo.com
Modified on
08/07/12